| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which blade collective pitch for my first collective heli? |
| Blade sr |
|
13% |
[ 2 ] |
| Blade mcp x |
|
26% |
[ 4 ] |
| Blade 130x |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
| Blade 450 |
|
53% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jake13 Charging

Joined: 30 Jun 2012 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 1:16 pm
Post subject: Transitioning to collective pitch |
|
|
|
I have had a 120 sr for a while and I think it is time to move up to a collective pitch. I am dead set on blade helis. I can't deside between the sr, mcp x, 130 x, or go to the blade 450. I have heard good things about all of them. Please help me decide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nick_onelove Extreme 3D


Joined: 01 May 2011 Posts: 835 Location: Mendocino County, CA, United States 21 years old
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 1:28 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Whatever you do, avoid the SR at all costs.
I threw in my vote for the mCP X, but if you can afford it don't be afraid of the Blade 450.
The 130 X is as of yet unproven, especially for a beginner. Mine just shipped yesterday, I'm super excited.  _________________ Align: Trex 250 3GX + Trex 450 Pro with Vbar
Blade: 450 X, mCP X, 120 SR, mSR X, CX3, mCX2
Esky: Belt-CP X and V2 - Futaba: Heli-Max Axe 400
Walkera: V500D01, M120D01, V100D08, DEVO 8
Spektrum: DX8 - AMA #967873 - IRCHA #4095 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admiral Extreme 3D


Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 914 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 2:48 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Jake13,
Nick is spot on with that advise, I have had an SR, don't touch it, it is the only Blade that I recommend against, love the mCP x but don't recommend it for you first CP heli it can be as docile as a lamb but when it gets away it is so quick, but it is very rugged and can take a bid of punishment. The 450 reacts more predictably, after starting small and working my way up I really wish that I'd started at 400/450 and worked my way down with CP, the bigger you get the easier they are. The down side to that they are more expensive to repair. _________________ Keep your rotors spinning
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sponsor
|
|
 |
tombo242 Extreme 3D


Joined: 04 Nov 2008 Posts: 4142 Location: Santo Estêvão, East Algarve, Portugal. 77, but still feels 18.
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 4:25 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Darned good advice above, I went for the 450 as the bigger ones are definately easier to fly. More expensive to repair - Yes! However, in the long run you may well have to repair it a lot less and being bigger it's easier to work on anyway.
Get the 450 and keep smiling!
Tom. _________________ Keep Smiling  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pjdog Extreme 3D

Joined: 12 Jan 2010 Posts: 1963 Location: Hudson, Florida, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 8:59 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
There is only one blade collective pitch helicopter. That's the 450. Use to be the B400 but the B400 is out of production being replaced with the B450.
For the monet you just can't beat a Blade B450.
My two cents worth.
Jack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chopper54 Extreme 3D


Joined: 15 Jan 2010 Posts: 989 Location: suffolk UK aged 58
|
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 9:56 pm
Post subject: post subject |
|
|
|
I would go with the 450 3d. Its a great way to get started and good value for money. The mcx-p is fantastic fun but very fast for a beginner. The sr is ok when matched to a decent transmitter but the one that comes with it is rubbish. I am really looking forward to getting the 130-x. i reckon this will be a cracker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flyby Extreme 3D


Joined: 02 Nov 2009 Posts: 175 Location: Swansea,UK Napoli,Italia - Age 56
|
Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:51 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Try to confuse things a bit more.....about the new 300X?
Albeit a bit smaller than a 450, with the proven flybarless technology of BeastX should be a very stable heli, with dedicated tail servo, easy to repair and set up and parts a quite cheap. _________________ Spektrum DX5e DX6i DX8
MCX, MSR, 130X, 2 Blades 400, T-Rex 550E 3G V3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Burgess Extreme 3D


Joined: 27 Mar 2012 Posts: 321 Location: Wales
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crash dummy Extreme 3D


Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 141 Location: Bunbury Western Australia
|
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2012 8:40 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
I went through this just a couple of weeks ago and decided on a bnf mcpx v2, I fly it with a dx8 and adjusted my aileron and elevator travel adjustments to just 35% with no expo, and 75% pitch, instead of using dual rates and accidentally knocking a DR switch resulting in a sudden surge of travel. I also dumbed the pitch curve right down so I have no negative pitch, for example I have my pitch curves set at 50-60-65-70-80 and use a linear throttle curve in normal mode but a 100-90-80-90-100 in F1 mode. I also set my pitch curve to 50% flat in throttle hold. So far I have had 1 and a half hours of steady tail in hover in my small kitchen its not as easy as an msr but its pretty close as I get better I will add a touch more travel adjust, I am thinking 5% each week as it becomes easier
I figure this tiny heli is a valuable learning aid worth its price 2 or 3 times over in 450 repairs anyway! _________________ 1...2...3....4....5.....6 Blade 400 rebuilds..and sold! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
admiral Extreme 3D


Joined: 20 Mar 2009 Posts: 914 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:42 am
Post subject: |
|
|
I agree the mCP X is great to practicing the Hover, but from somebody transitioning to CP, who is reasonably new to helicopters, it gets away easily and when it does is too quick, the 450 size is more predictable.
I'm trying to fly inverted at the moment with my mCP X something I wouldn't try with the 450, but the mCP X is ideal, if/when it goes pear shaped the damage is minimal if any.
A great learning tool just not for beginner IMHO. _________________ Keep your rotors spinning
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|